新加坡法律饼干店
#01-LAW
est. 2023 · baked daily, no holidays
FRESH BATCH · 06:01 SGT
SELF SERVICE · 自助服务
8 cookies that day

baked fresh
that morning

Singapore's daily legal output, reduced to the signals worth biting into.

★ THE DAILY BAKE ★

DATEFRI 10 JUL 2026
OVEN OPENED06:01 SGT

○ NEWS8
⬡ JUDGMENTS0
▲ PINEAPPLE TARTS3
FRESH3
COOLING RACK2

BUSIEST OVENREAL PROPERTY LAW ×2
NEW INGREDIENT"COORDINATED EFFECTS"

thank you — come again tomorrow

FRESHLY LOGGED

straight from the oven, tray by tray

The chips on each cookie are its FOLIO concepts — more chips, more doctrine. Pineapple tarts are reserved for the signals you act on. 2 more bakes are on the cooling rack below.

Today's Specials

the pineapple tarts — they change what you do on Monday
01○ NEWS

First phase of Corporate and Accounting Laws (Amendment) Act 2025 commences on 6 May 2026.

Key provisions of the Act entered into force on 6 May 2026. The amendments introduce stricter penalties for directors, measures to prevent the use of companies for illegal activities, and enhanced requirements for auditing accountability and shareholder protection.

Why it mattersLawyers must advise corporate clients and directors on their increased liability and the heightened compliance standards regarding auditing and company governance.

02○ NEWS

Proposed legislation to criminalise holding a mobile phone while driving regardless of usage.

The Road Traffic (Miscellaneous Amendments) Bill seeks to lower the threshold for mobile phone violations. Instead of requiring proof that a driver was using a device, the mere act of holding a phone while driving will be illegal.

Why it mattersLawyers should advise clients that the evidentiary burden for traffic offenses will shift, making it significantly easier for authorities to secure convictions using visual evidence.

03○ NEWS

High Court clarifies the test for restrictions of competition "by object" under the Competition Act.

The High Court has issued a landmark decision detailing the factors used to determine if competitor conduct constitutes a restriction of competition "by object". In doing so, the Court reversed a prior decision made by the Competition and Consumer Commission of Singapore (CCCS/CAB).

Why it mattersLawyers must apply this clarified test when assessing whether a client's competitive conduct falls into the category of a restriction by object under the Competition Act.