Tuesday, 4 August 2026 — SG Law Cookies

Today's Specials

the pineapple tarts — they change what you do on Monday

01○ NEWS

Proposed updates to the collective sale regime via the Land Titles (Strata) (Amendment) Bill 2026.

The Bill introduces stratified consent thresholds for older properties and extends majority-consent sales to certain non-strata-titled private residential developments. These measures aim to facilitate the renewal of ageing developments and improve land use optimization.

Why it mattersLawyers advising developers and property owners must navigate updated consent requirements for triggering collective sales.

MLAW READ SOURCE ↗

02○ NEWS

Court of Appeal establishes a distinct Singaporean framework for negligence claims in auditor liability cases.

In Deloitte & Touche LLP v Hin Leong Trading (Pte) Ltd, a five-member Court of Appeal coram struck out a US$2.6 billion claim for trading losses brought by liquidators against a former auditor. The judgment marks a move toward an autochthonous approach to the law of negligence in Singapore.

Why it mattersPractitioners must apply this new domestic framework rather than relying solely on foreign precedents when assessing negligence and auditor liability for financial losses.

SLW READ SOURCE ↗

03○ NEWS

High Court implements new procedure for defendants unfit to plead.

The High Court has introduced a new regime for defendants who lack the mental competency to stand trial. Under this process, a judge confirms the defendant's incapacity and recommends a 'notional imprisonment period' as a sentencing cap, which allows the Law Minister to order confinement.

Why it mattersPractitioners must be aware of this new procedural framework when representing clients who are mentally unfit to plead, particularly regarding the determination of notional sentencing caps.

SLW READ SOURCE ↗

04○ NEWS

Fabrication of evidence via AI carries criminal liability.

The Ministry of Law has reaffirmed that using AI to fabricate evidence is a criminal offense. To combat this, the judiciary is employing digital forensics and specialized training to authenticate evidence.

Why it mattersPractitioners must caution clients and be vigilant against AI-fabricated evidence, as its submission involves severe criminal risks.

MLAW READ SOURCE ↗

05⬡ JUDGMENT

Court of Appeal holds in [2026] SGCA 36 that Magistrates lack supervisory jurisdiction and extradition-related challenges must exhaust criminal revision before judicial review.

The Court ruled that a Magistrate had no jurisdiction to hear a challenge to seized items in extradition proceedings because such supervisory power belongs exclusively to the General Division of the High Court. It further held that the remedy of criminal revision under the SCJA must be exhausted before judicial review can be sought, as revision—being a permission-free remedy—should logically precede a remedy requiring permission.

Why it mattersPractitioners challenging extradition-related decisions must now first pursue criminal revision under ss 23 and 27(1) SCJA before seeking judicial review, and cannot circumvent procedural requirements by filing supervisory applications in lower courts.

JUDICIARY READ JUDGMENT ↗

06⬡ JUDGMENT

SGHCR rules in [2026] SGHCR 31 that information barrier documents and cross-team communications may be discoverable as a 'special case' where they form a 'central plank' of the defense.

The court allowed partial production of Categories 19, 22, 23 and 24 as special cases, finding that where the sufficiency of information barriers is central to resisting disqualification, refusal to produce would be 'wholly perverse.' Pre-barrier communications and team identity documents were also producible to assess cross-contamination risk, but redundant and immaterial categories were dismissed.

Why it mattersLaw firms implementing information barriers in concurrent representation situations must now anticipate that barrier protocols, team compositions, and pre-implementation communications may be subject to discovery if challenged.

JUDICIARY READ JUDGMENT ↗

baked fresh
that morning

★ THE DAILY BAKE ★

Today's Specials

Proposed updates to the collective sale regime via the Land Titles (Strata) (Amendment) Bill 2026.

Court of Appeal establishes a distinct Singaporean framework for negligence claims in auditor liability cases.

High Court implements new procedure for defendants unfit to plead.

Fabrication of evidence via AI carries criminal liability.

Court of Appeal holds in [2026] SGCA 36 that Magistrates lack supervisory jurisdiction and extradition-related challenges must exhaust criminal revision before judicial review.

SGHCR rules in [2026] SGHCR 31 that information barrier documents and cross-team communications may be discoverable as a 'special case' where they form a 'central plank' of the defense.

The Rest of the Menu

baked freshthat morning

★ THE DAILY BAKE ★

Today's Specials

Proposed updates to the collective sale regime via the Land Titles (Strata) (Amendment) Bill 2026.

Court of Appeal establishes a distinct Singaporean framework for negligence claims in auditor liability cases.

High Court implements new procedure for defendants unfit to plead.

Fabrication of evidence via AI carries criminal liability.

Court of Appeal holds in [2026] SGCA 36 that Magistrates lack supervisory jurisdiction and extradition-related challenges must exhaust criminal revision before judicial review.

SGHCR rules in [2026] SGHCR 31 that information barrier documents and cross-team communications may be discoverable as a 'special case' where they form a 'central plank' of the defense.

The Rest of the Menu

baked fresh
that morning