SG Law Cookies
新加坡法律饼干店
#01-LAW
est. 2023 · baked daily, no holidays
FRESH BATCH · 20:42 SGT
SELF SERVICE · 自助服务
6 cookies that day

baked fresh
that morning

Singapore's daily legal output, reduced to the signals worth biting into.

★ THE DAILY BAKE ★

DATESAT 19 SEP 2026
OVEN OPENED20:42 SGT
○ NEWS0
⬡ JUDGMENTS6
▲ PINEAPPLE TARTS0
FRESH6
COOLING RACK0
BUSIEST OVENDEFAMATION LAW ×5
NEW INGREDIENT"ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES"

thank you — come again tomorrow

FRESHLY LOGGED

straight from the oven, tray by tray

DISPLAY CASE · SCROLL →
Magistrate's Court in [2026] SGMC 108 restates the dual requirement for publication in Internet defamation: uploading material and proof of actual download by a third party in Singapore. Defamation Law · JUDICIARY $0.60 · FRESH
Magistrate's Court in [2026] SGMC 108 holds that Facebook reactions and comments cannot prove wider readership without adduced content and where bot activity cannot be discounted; hearsay from non-testifying friends is inadmissible. Defamation Law · JUDICIARY $0.60 · FRESH
Magistrate's Court in [2026] SGMC 108 finds no legal publication where defendant admitted making public Facebook posts but claimant produced no evidence any witness actually read them. Defamation Law · JUDICIARY $0.60 · FRESH
District Court holds in Haweina Trading Co Ltd v Bling Blink SG Pte Ltd [2026] SGDC 307 that foreign corporate claimants must prove a trading or business reputation in Singapore as a prerequisite for libel claims. Defamation Law · JUDICIARY $0.60 · FRESH
District Court in Haweina Trading Co Ltd v Bling Blink SG Pte Ltd [2026] SGDC 307 clarifies what evidence suffices to prove corporate reputation in Singapore, dismissing appeal for insufficient proof. Defamation Law · JUDICIARY $0.60 · FRESH
Magistrates' Court holds in [2026] SGMC 102 that custodial sentence is the starting point for offences under section 22(1)(d) of the Employment of Foreign Manpower Act. Immigration Law · [2026] SGMC 102 $0.60 · FRESH

The chips on each cookie are its FOLIO concepts — more chips, more doctrine. Pineapple tarts are reserved for the signals you act on.

see how the day spread across the counter →

The Rest of the Menu

6 fresh cookies, worth knowing — grouped by oven

Defamation Law ×5
⬡Magistrate's Court in [2026] SGMC 108 restates the dual requirement for publication in Internet defamation: uploading material and proof of actual download by a third party in Singapore.JUDICIARY ⬡Magistrate's Court in [2026] SGMC 108 holds that Facebook reactions and comments cannot prove wider readership without adduced content and where bot activity cannot be discounted; hearsay from non-testifying friends is inadmissible.JUDICIARY ⬡Magistrate's Court in [2026] SGMC 108 finds no legal publication where defendant admitted making public Facebook posts but claimant produced no evidence any witness actually read them.JUDICIARY ⬡District Court holds in Haweina Trading Co Ltd v Bling Blink SG Pte Ltd [2026] SGDC 307 that foreign corporate claimants must prove a trading or business reputation in Singapore as a prerequisite for libel claims.JUDICIARY ⬡District Court in Haweina Trading Co Ltd v Bling Blink SG Pte Ltd [2026] SGDC 307 clarifies what evidence suffices to prove corporate reputation in Singapore, dismissing appeal for insufficient proof.JUDICIARY
Immigration Law ×1
⬡Magistrates' Court holds in [2026] SGMC 102 that custodial sentence is the starting point for offences under section 22(1)(d) of the Employment of Foreign Manpower Act.[2026] SGMC 102