SG Law Cookies
新加坡法律饼干店
#01-LAW
est. 2023 · baked daily, no holidays
FRESH BATCH · 23:30 SGT
SELF SERVICE · 自助服务
10 cookies today

baked fresh
this morning

Singapore's daily legal output, reduced to the signals worth biting into.

★ THE DAILY BAKE ★

DATESAT 10 OCT 2026
OVEN OPENED23:30 SGT
○ NEWS2
⬡ JUDGMENTS8
▲ PINEAPPLE TARTS0
FRESH10
COOLING RACK0
BUSIEST OVENCRIMINAL LAW ×4
NEW INGREDIENT"AOF V PUBLIC PROSECUTOR [2012] 3 SLR 34"

thank you — come again tomorrow

FRESHLY LOGGED

straight from the oven, tray by tray

DISPLAY CASE · SCROLL →
IPOS clarifies regulatory scope regarding Collective Management Organisations (CMOs) and licensing fees. Intellectual Property Law · MLAW $0.60 · FRESH
SGFC holds in [2026] SGFC 133 that courts may order costs against litigants in person for tardiness under the Family Justice (General) Rules 2024. JUDICIARY $0.60 · FRESH
District Court in Artem Ibragimov v Liu Xun [2026] SGDC 334 confirms foreign exclusive jurisdiction clauses are construed by governing law per Jian He, with no material difference found between Singapore and Cayman law. Contract Law · JUDICIARY $0.60 · FRESH
High Court clarifies in [2026] SGHC 212 that the 'unusually convincing' standard from AOF v PP is a heuristic tool, not a separate test, and does not apply where corroborative evidence exists. Criminal Law · JUDICIARY $0.60 · FRESH
High Court in [2026] SGHC 212 demonstrates that CCTV and video evidence can undermine complainant credibility when it contradicts claimed emotional states and post-incident conduct. Criminal Law · JUDICIARY $0.60 · FRESH
SGHC holds in [2026] SGHC 210 that retrospective application of truth defence in arbitral defamation counterclaim is error of law, not natural justice breach. Arbitration Law · JUDICIARY $0.60 · FRESH
SGHC holds in [2026] SGHC 210 that failure to consider net profits defence on quantification does not breach natural justice where claim dismissed at threshold. Arbitration Law · JUDICIARY $0.60 · FRESH
District Court in PP v De Villar Rizalyn Panganiban [2026] SGDC 332 holds that actual knowledge of operating in a scam centre suffices for membership of a locally-linked organised criminal group under section 5(1) of the Organised Crime Act 2015, regardless of unfamiliarity with local specifics. Criminal Law · JUDICIARY $0.60 · FRESH
District Court in PP v De Villar Rizalyn Panganiban [2026] SGDC 332 holds that sustained participation in a tiered calling system with understanding of fraudulent scripts constitutes agreement for criminal conspiracy under section 120B read with section 420 of the Penal Code 1871. Criminal Law · JUDICIARY $0.60 · FRESH
Mandatory confirmation of officer and member particulars during annual return filings. Corporate Law · ACRA $0.60 · FRESH

The chips on each cookie are its FOLIO concepts — more chips, more doctrine. Pineapple tarts are reserved for the signals you act on.

see how the day spread across the counter →

The Rest of the Menu

10 fresh cookies, worth knowing — grouped by oven

Criminal Law ×4
⬡High Court clarifies in [2026] SGHC 212 that the 'unusually convincing' standard from AOF v PP is a heuristic tool, not a separate test, and does not apply where corroborative evidence exists.JUDICIARY ⬡High Court in [2026] SGHC 212 demonstrates that CCTV and video evidence can undermine complainant credibility when it contradicts claimed emotional states and post-incident conduct.JUDICIARY ⬡District Court in PP v De Villar Rizalyn Panganiban [2026] SGDC 332 holds that actual knowledge of operating in a scam centre suffices for membership of a locally-linked organised criminal group under section 5(1) of the Organised Crime Act 2015, regardless of unfamiliarity with local specifics.JUDICIARY ⬡District Court in PP v De Villar Rizalyn Panganiban [2026] SGDC 332 holds that sustained participation in a tiered calling system with understanding of fraudulent scripts constitutes agreement for criminal conspiracy under section 120B read with section 420 of the Penal Code 1871.JUDICIARY
Arbitration Law ×2
⬡SGHC holds in [2026] SGHC 210 that retrospective application of truth defence in arbitral defamation counterclaim is error of law, not natural justice breach.JUDICIARY ⬡SGHC holds in [2026] SGHC 210 that failure to consider net profits defence on quantification does not breach natural justice where claim dismissed at threshold.JUDICIARY
Contract Law ×1
⬡District Court in Artem Ibragimov v Liu Xun [2026] SGDC 334 confirms foreign exclusive jurisdiction clauses are construed by governing law per Jian He, with no material difference found between Singapore and Cayman law.JUDICIARY
Corporate Law ×1
○Mandatory confirmation of officer and member particulars during annual return filings.ACRA
General ×1
⬡SGFC holds in [2026] SGFC 133 that courts may order costs against litigants in person for tardiness under the Family Justice (General) Rules 2024.JUDICIARY
Intellectual Property Law ×1
○IPOS clarifies regulatory scope regarding Collective Management Organisations (CMOs) and licensing fees.MLAW